<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Cafe Hayek - Latest Comments in Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/</link><description>Where Orders Emerge</description><atom:link href="https://cafehayek.disqus.com/wal_mart039s_benefits/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:10:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2005/12/walmarts_benefi.html#comment-13613750</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why on earth would you link to a version of a paper behind a toll-access barrier?  No one can read the NBER copy.  The author's FREE copy of the paper is at&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=1243" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=1243"&gt;http://econ-www.mit.edu/fac...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You should always link to the author's free copy.  Readers get no benefit from paying NBER US$ 5 for a peek that the author would like to give away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous Coward</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:10:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2005/12/walmarts_benefi.html#comment-13613749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Consumers need Wal-Marts benefits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our economy has become quite adept at destroying $20-an-hour jobs and creating $9-an-hour jobs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And how did Wal-Mart get special treatment from the Department of Labor? The best politicians money can buy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">save_the_rustbelt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:51:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2005/12/walmarts_benefi.html#comment-13613748</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wal-Mart bashing is really picking up a head of steam lately.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Meisenzahl</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:44:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2005/12/walmarts_benefi.html#comment-13613747</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Walmart is being scapegoated for a lot of economic problems that are not WMT's fault.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">spencer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:46:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2005/12/walmarts_benefi.html#comment-13613746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"In this paper we estimate consumer benefits from supercenter entry and expansion into markets for food. We estimate a discrete choice model for household shopping choice of supercenters and traditional outlets for food."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The words "we estimate" hardly stick out.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Who'd a'thunk it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Helen&amp;#39;skid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 07:46:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wal-Mart&amp;#039;s Benefits</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2005/12/walmarts_benefi.html#comment-13613745</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its interesting how the anti-Walmart folks have been able to set the terms of the debate.  Here we have an article that defends the supercenters on the grounds that they benefit low-income households.  True enough - but the best defense of Walmart is that it is making money. It does this by providing a service that its customers want.  And yes, the shareholders are making money.  That is what SHOULD happen when a corporation provides a service that its customers want.  The answer to those who oppose Walmart is; if you don't like the way Walmart does business, then compete against it.  Set up a non-profit big box operation that pays high wages and good benefits, and only buys and sells products made in America. Yes, this may be difficult.  You think Sam Walton had it easy?  He started small and kept building.  Bottom line; if you're not willing to compete, to put your money where your mouth is, you won't be taken seriously. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>