This is one of my favorite short stories ever. Thanks for posting it.
Steve Horwitz
· 2 years ago
And, of course, there is Rush's "The Trees" which picks up the same theme:
http://www.lyricscafe.com/r/rush/036.htm
Storey
· 2 years ago
So it goes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atABhlMLYvU
Ed Lopez
· 2 years ago
Vonnegut was an avowed socialist who admired the practical implications of Marxian economics and heavily advocated welfare-state style redistribution. This story is far subtler than a critique of leveling. I believe Vonnegut's intention is to remove a couple arrows from the quivers of redistribution's critics.
Dr.Dean
· 2 years ago
Equality is not the same as equality. There are democratic forms of equality. Strict forms. Moderate forms. And so on.
And there is strict inequality and strict injustice - which make real liberalism impossible.
So - the truth is in the middle.
Ray G
· 2 years ago
In my youth, Vonnegut was one of those writers whom I felt that I "had" to read in order to qualify as well read.
But of course his writing would just drag, and I never got very far in any of his work.
Personally I liken his work to pop music. Very few people really like it all that much. Thus, a majority of Vonnegut sold sits pretentiously undisturbed on so many book shelves.
Rex Pjesky
· 2 years ago
Ray G, I agree. I really don't know why he is famous. Of course, this short story is very insightful.
Rex Pjesky
· 2 years ago
Follow up: Could his popularity (given Ray G's hypothesis that many people claim to like him that really do) be a case of a thrid degree network externality?
Rex Pjesky
· 2 years ago
I should have said "...that many more people claim to like him that really do)
All Comments
This is one of my favorite short stories ever. Thanks for posting it.
And, of course, there is Rush's "The Trees" which picks up the same theme:
http://www.lyricscafe.com/r/rush/036.htm
So it goes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atABhlMLYvU
Vonnegut was an avowed socialist who admired the practical implications of Marxian economics and heavily advocated welfare-state style redistribution. This story is far subtler than a critique of leveling. I believe Vonnegut's intention is to remove a couple arrows from the quivers of redistribution's critics.
Equality is not the same as equality. There are democratic forms of equality. Strict forms. Moderate forms. And so on.
And there is strict inequality and strict injustice - which make real liberalism impossible.
So - the truth is in the middle.
In my youth, Vonnegut was one of those writers whom I felt that I "had" to read in order to qualify as well read.
But of course his writing would just drag, and I never got very far in any of his work.
Personally I liken his work to pop music. Very few people really like it all that much. Thus, a majority of Vonnegut sold sits pretentiously undisturbed on so many book shelves.
Ray G, I agree. I really don't know why he is famous. Of course, this short story is very insightful.
Follow up: Could his popularity (given Ray G's hypothesis that many people claim to like him that really do) be a case of a thrid degree network externality?
I should have said "...that many more people claim to like him that really do)
I also should have spelled "third" correctly.
I elaborate on my above remarks here: http://divisionoflabour.com/archives/003714.php</p>
Good blog
I hope everybody read this article.
thanks for informations.