<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Cafe Hayek - Latest Comments in The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/</link><description>Where Orders Emerge</description><atom:link href="https://cafehayek.disqus.com/the_change_in_our_standard_of_living/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:46:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624782</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sam, &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You're in good company. With the exception of a question-ducking troll and a couple of others, most of the people who read this blog understand how forced redistribution of income has made us all poorer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brotio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:46:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624781</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd rather be a millionaire today, and many more of us would have been but for all the wealth wasted on various government enabled 'projects'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HELLO! Doesn't anyone else think about this?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:36:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually had an econ teacher who presented the case to my class: would you rather make $50,000 a year now or be a millionaire tycoon a hundred years ago? I was the only one who volunteered to take the former option. After he made the same argument Coyote does, most of the class still said they'd prefer to be late-19th-century millionaires. I've always wondered if that was because of a status-oriented mindset or some sort of bias.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, if I were a millionaire today, I'd probably spend most of it on videogame-related oddities, so maybe I have a little bias too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Swimmy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:30:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624779</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really want to know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One problem with an improved standard of living through technological innovation and improved productivity is that the perception of being better off than we were distracts us from how well off we could be and diverts our attention from politically enabled (unearned) consumption, which is a polite way of saying that people are unaware of how much wealth  political parasitism steals from the productive.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:18:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624778</link><description>&lt;p&gt;projected date?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OnlyShawn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:05:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds great, looking forward to it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">speedmaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 07:00:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree that most of us are wealthier in most regards than those that came before.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now let us consider how wealthy we would be had we not allowed government to divert large portions of our wealth, and investment, into our global empire, the various wars (both foreign and domestic), and other wasteful boondoggles, such as corporate subsidies and extensive bureaucracy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How wealthy would we be? Wealthy enough that there would be little demand for government provided services?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Have you given much thought to that?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Grove</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:16:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The change in our standard of living</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/12/the-change-in-o.html#comment-13624775</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dr. Roberts,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I wholeheartedly await your next book. "The Choice" and reading Cafe Hayek religiously since then have utterly changed the way I think. For that, I thank you, and I shall order "The Price of Everything" as soon as it is available.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Lasater</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:10:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>