-
Website
http://cafehayek.com/ -
Original page
http://cafehayek.com/2006/07/stationary_band.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Ike Pigott
204 comments · 74 points
-
Mommsen1625
516 comments · 147 points
-
sandre
469 comments · 154 points
-
Justin P
653 comments · 41 points
-
SheetWise
126 comments · 29 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Mark Steyn on Obamacare
14 hours ago · 84 comments
-
It’s How They Succeed
12 hours ago · 20 comments
-
Where Responsibility Belongs
1 day ago · 77 comments
-
Elfin Magic
2 days ago · 80 comments
-
A New Deal Constitution
1 day ago · 25 comments
-
Mark Steyn on Obamacare
I strongly agree with your sentiments above, but governments occasionally do liberalize on their own, and according to the World Bank autonomous liberalization accounted for 66% of tariff liberalization from 1983-2003, see http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2005/06/23/autonom...>
While I wish well for multilateral negotiations I loathe the logic of such for exactly the reasons you state.
Despite the logic of stationary bandits it seems unilateral free trade is in fact more important than pacts and is infinitely more savory.
I read a phrase in a review not too long ago that stuck with me: "even the most cynical public choice economist. . ."
I thought it was redundant.
I've developed a tendency to immediately turn my ears off when I hear the phrase "public interest."
/agree
And thank you Mike, for some relatively optmistic news.
Perhaps if we didn't allow lawyers to make the laws, there would be a little less plundering.
Bravo! Bravo!
Massed clapping, cries of "Encore Maestro"!
It is simply so darn difficult to get over the idea to people that it is imports that make us rich so why on earth are we taxing them?