<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Cafe Hayek - Latest Comments in Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.disqus.com/</link><description>Where Orders Emerge</description><atom:link href="https://cafehayek.disqus.com/kling_on_medical_care_or_how_americans_are_screwing_themselves/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:08:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brad's on the right track but it's also simply exposing health care insurance as anything but insurance.  It's almost as ridiculous to insure the need for sex (somewhat frequent) with the need for routine health care (also somewhat frequent).  In both cases when it seems free we partake without concern for cost.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In some cases the health care choices are very similar to a choice of using a prostitute.  Elective cosmetic surgery is a good example of health care dollars going to what many consider frivilous.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Morgan's point is well taken.  Showing how other things are or are not insured exposes the fundemental flaw in todays health insurance model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Kling is looking to educate us by showing things in a different light or from a new point of view.  Someone needs to to do it and break the issue down so more can understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Plunk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Prostitution insurance to health insurance, to be clear. His hope is that, by changing the thing that's insured, he'll get people to look deeper than "health care is a basic human right" and other thought-stunting slogans to see the range of inefficiencies and outright absurdities in the current system. I've tried the same thing - replacing health care with cars - but few people seem to be willing to take the trip.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Morgan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 03:43:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621402</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's funny. I didn't read Kling's essay to be analogizing prostitution to health care. I read it analogizing prostitution to health insurance. But maybe I'm just stupid.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:30:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;All prices are determined by both demand and supply. To paraphrase Alfred Marshall, to claim otherwise is to claim that only one blade of a pair of scissors does the cutting.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Correct.  However, an &lt;i&gt;increase&lt;/i&gt; in price can be due to one or the other.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 18:02:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621400</link><description>&lt;p&gt;All prices are determined by both demand and supply.  To paraphrase Alfred Marshall, to claim otherwise is to claim that only one blade of a pair of scissors does the cutting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noah Yetter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kling's analogy of prostitution to health care is, to put it mildly, silly.  Even if he had just written a straight article on health care, his analysis suffers from his failure to understand that health care costs are not demand-driven, but, as actual experts in health care economics like Thomas Rice have convincingly argued, supply-driven.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 13:24:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621398</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Marc,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The DSM-IV begs to differ - with the "sex" part, maybe not so much the "casual" bit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Methinks</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:50:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to undercut the analogy in terms of pure economics, but isn't the first objection to this going to be, "casual sex is not exactly a necessity of modern society?"  Or maybe I'm a bit spoiled that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. Hodak</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 12:32:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621396</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just stumbled on that earlier today, well-done.  ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Speedmaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:10:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621395</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's what passes for insight in libertarian circles these days?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Donegal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 10:00:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kling on Medical Care; Or, How Americans are Screwing Themselves</title><link>http://cafehayek.com/2007/05/kling_on_medica.html#comment-13621394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What?  I shouldn't reach around my back to scratch my nose?  Perish the thought!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great article.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Methinks</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:11:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>