Would it improve outcomes if non-residents flooded the call center with reports of price gouging by city and state officials?
Unit
· 1 year ago
Don needs to write a letter to the editor of Naples Daily News.....
Ronald Hayden
· 1 year ago
Given how this gives people the power to tattle as a form of general retribution, and given how any price at all can be called gouging in an emergency, were I a vendor in this region, I think I'd just close up shop and wait it out.
Depriving people of needed goods is terrible, but being put at the mercy of any scold or person with a grudge may be untenable.
I assume if enough vendors take this approach, the government reaction will be (if it isn't already) to force you to sell goods, and at a "reasonable" or, more likely, set price.
Doug
· 1 year ago
I think the definition of price gouging should be to transact business at above the market clearing price.
It should also be a crime to sell below the market clearing price - this has a very negative effect on human well being as has been pointed out in earlier EconTalk podcasts.
Hammer
· 1 year ago
I am waiting for the government to decree that charging any price during an emergency is illegal, and the cost of doing business in an area will be voluntarily rationing free goods to those who show up to ask.
It is obviously the next logical step, since there is apparently a moral issue with profiting when people need something, whether they could have bought it the day before or not. Of course, the next step is to apply the rule to private citizens, not only public stores, so having bought supplies the day before only means you will be forced to give them away to those who didn't plan ahead the day of an emergency.
I_am_a_lead_pencil
· 1 year ago
Ronald Hayden said:
I assume if enough vendors take this approach, the government reaction will be (if it isn't already) to force you to sell goods, and at a "reasonable" or, more likely, set price.
Either that or they will set up FEMA "stores" to sell all "needed" merchandise.
All Comments
Would it improve outcomes if non-residents flooded the call center with reports of price gouging by city and state officials?
Don needs to write a letter to the editor of Naples Daily News.....
Given how this gives people the power to tattle as a form of general retribution, and given how any price at all can be called gouging in an emergency, were I a vendor in this region, I think I'd just close up shop and wait it out.
Depriving people of needed goods is terrible, but being put at the mercy of any scold or person with a grudge may be untenable.
I assume if enough vendors take this approach, the government reaction will be (if it isn't already) to force you to sell goods, and at a "reasonable" or, more likely, set price.
I think the definition of price gouging should be to transact business at above the market clearing price.
It should also be a crime to sell below the market clearing price - this has a very negative effect on human well being as has been pointed out in earlier EconTalk podcasts.
I am waiting for the government to decree that charging any price during an emergency is illegal, and the cost of doing business in an area will be voluntarily rationing free goods to those who show up to ask.
It is obviously the next logical step, since there is apparently a moral issue with profiting when people need something, whether they could have bought it the day before or not. Of course, the next step is to apply the rule to private citizens, not only public stores, so having bought supplies the day before only means you will be forced to give them away to those who didn't plan ahead the day of an emergency.
Ronald Hayden said:
Either that or they will set up FEMA "stores" to sell all "needed" merchandise.
The US DOE is on the case as well.
At least there is a clear way to determine who the offenders are.
So far, there are allot of complaints and some are under "suspicion."