-
Website
http://cafehayek.com/ -
Original page
http://cafehayek.com/2006/09/dynamics_of_eco.html -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Ike Pigott
204 comments · 74 points
-
Mommsen1625
516 comments · 147 points
-
sandre
469 comments · 154 points
-
Justin P
653 comments · 41 points
-
SheetWise
126 comments · 29 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Mark Steyn on Obamacare
14 hours ago · 84 comments
-
It’s How They Succeed
12 hours ago · 20 comments
-
Where Responsibility Belongs
1 day ago · 77 comments
-
Elfin Magic
2 days ago · 80 comments
-
A New Deal Constitution
1 day ago · 25 comments
-
Mark Steyn on Obamacare
I find this odd.
Don't some measures of poverty count someone if they entered into poverty during that year?
Wouldn't 2 years mean they would count more people?
I suppose a 2-year average income window would indeed lower poverty rates. Wouldn't it also lower things on the highest end?
What would be really interesting is if someone who signs a book deal and gets a $5,000,000 advance (yes, that is an extremely high advance for a writer, so what?) in one year, and then receives zero royalties in the next year, and receives a single $10,000 speaking fee in that second year and the next year too.
Income in year 1: $5,000,000. Top 1%.
Income in year 2: $10,000. Bottom decile.
Income in year 3: $10,000. Bottom decile.
Just a thought. Perhaps we should indeed average out individual incomes over two or more years to avoid such misreadings of what is really happening. Then we can see how many truly poor people we really have, and to what extent the top 1% is a result of an exceptional year instead of recurring income from stock options or other bonuses.